Search results for: "A" (4258 results)
a catch-all “any other contract, agreement, or arrangement” which assists an “education program or activity”), with 28 C.F.R. § 42.102(c) (2023
Court precedents, a private party should be able to bring an action for injunctive relief as an anticipatory preemption defense.21 Second, and more
school facilities, and student attendance at off-campus parties); see also Roberts v. Madigan, 921 F.2d 1047 (10th Cir. 1990) (applying Hazelwood to the in-class Bible reading ...
“[Abortion] is an activity that many people find abhorrent and corrupt. . . . Supreme Court Justices are not immune from such personal views. As a portion
community for years as a way to gener- ate revenue for the city 132 —an approach wholly at odds with community polic- ing and equality. The consent
legislative authority over matters pertaining to the empire, and later the Union, as a whole. Another way to put this argument is to say that American
requirements in the CLOUD Act merely create a floor as to the procedural and substantive requirements to be included in any cross-border access agree- ments
jurisdiction over the data of interest, including the rightful authority to control and restrict access.18 It also requires agreement as to when a
requirements in the CLOUD Act merely create a floor as to the procedural and substantive requirements to be included in any cross-border access agree
amend, and can leave room for administrative flexibility. Without detracting from those arguments, we can add that statutes also allow for a more