Search results for: "n" (4026 results)
to protect children from substance effects); Minow, supra note 77, at 283-87 & n.101 (noting the complicated and sometimes hostile relationship
94 IOWA L. REV. 1253, 1265 n.45 (2009) (discussing the emergence of same-sex marriage in a minority of states). Most states do not permit same-sex
not always a sure guide for social explanation, inquiring 126. MACINTYRE, supra note 94, at 221. 127. Id. at 212 (emphasis added). 128. KARL N
some currently covered jurisdictions have previously bailed out. See U.S. COMM’N ON CIVIL RIGHTS, supra note 99, at 14-15 & n.13 (noting the bailouts
Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Nos. 22608-07, 3058-08, 2009 WL 20115106, at 2 n.2 (U.S. Tax. Ct. July 13, 2009); Mueller v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No
tack. See, e.g., L. Luviano v. Multi Cable, Inc., No. 15- 05592, 2017 WL 3017195, at *16 n.20 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2017). 62. Richardson v. Bledsoe, 829 F
129. Dudley & Stephens, 14 Q.B.D. at 288 n.17. 130. JASPERS, supra note 38, at 31. 131. Id. The translation in the text is my own; Ashton prefers
Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514, 525 n.8 (2001) (drawing “no distinction” between the media and non-media respondents in a case about the
559 S A M H E A V E N R I C H The Neglected Port Preference Clause and the Jones Act abstract. The Port Preference Clause, which restricts
supra note 43, at 685 n.71. Perhaps because he recognized that “Professor Deak did not purport to include all [potentially relevant] cases,” id. at