Search results for: "2" (3539 results)
Against the States: The Hornbooks Have It Wrong, 29 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 939, 941 (1996). 2. See, e.g., Richard A. Epstein, Past and Future: The
Credibility 2006 1. “Silent Witnesses” Conveying Images 2006 2. Basic Scientific Instruments 2009 3. Computerized Business Records 2011 4
; COLO. REV. STAT. ANN. § 31-2-210 (West 2002); FLA. STAT. ANN. § 166.031(2) (West 2000); MICH. COMP. LAWS § 117.21(1) (2015); N.Y. MUN. HOME RULE LAW
& FEREJOHN, supra note 2, at 216-20, 228-33. the yale law journal 121:534 2011 562 As another example, consider Ackerman’s theory of
2205 2. Outreach, Intake, and Client Choice 2206 3. System Accessibility and Accuracy 2207 conclusion 2208 appendix: “power calculations” 2210
hepatitis and (2) face incentives to conceal their illness. Id. at 1702-05. BENKLER_POST_FLIP2_INTRO_ADDED.DOC 3/15/2005 7:42:29 PM 2004] Sharing Nicely
delegate or a trustee”). Heinz Eulau & Paul D. Karps, The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness, 2 Legis. Stud. Q. 233, 247
269 2. Efficiency Costs of Low-Salience Taxation 270 ii. fine-tuning tax salience 272 A. Identifying the Efficient Degree of Tax Salience 272 B
exist. Paragraph 2 of Article 42 provides: “The termination of a treaty, its denunciation or the withdrawal of a party, may take place only as a result of
of Representatives). 2. See, e.g., David D. Kirkpatrick, Senate Passes Vast Overhaul in Ethics Rules, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 19, 2007, at A1 (noting