Search results for: "710" (352 results)
710 (2017). 52. See, e.g., WU, supra note 51 (advocating for antitrust as a mechanism for addressing economic inequality); Harry First & Spencer
J. LEGIS. & PUB. POL’Y 685, 710-18 (2016) (de- scribing the lack-of-data problem for small geographic areas). For more on the shortcomings on the FHA
Prince, 714 F.3d 694, 710-12 (2d Cir. 2013). 91. Id. 92. Id. at 707-08; Cariou v. Prince, 784 F. Supp. 2d 337, 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2011), rev’d in part
Khan, Note, Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox, 126 YALE L.J. 710 (2017). 52. See, e.g., WU, supra note 51 (advocating for antitrust as a mechanism for
or no social value). 143. Kobayashi, supra note 138, at 710. 144. Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2, 25 (1984). 145. See
in Fair Housing Cases After Inclusive Communities, 19 N.Y.U. J. LEGIS. & PUB. POL’Y 685, 710-18 (2016) (de- scribing the lack-of-data problem for
Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color, 43 STAN. L. REV. 1241, 1242-44 (1991). 196. Chen, supra note 192, at 687. 197. Id. at 710
simply by not being 224. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Mem’l Hosp., 710 P.2d 1025, 1033 (Ariz. 1985). 225. Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 23-1501 (2023). 226
SUBSTANCE ABUSE: STATE AND FEDERAL OVERSIGHT OF COMPLIANCE WITH PARITY REQUIREMENTS VARIES 11 (Dec. 2019), https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/703239.pdf
No. 73-67, 48 Stat. 195 (1933) (formerly codi- fied at 15 U.S.C. §§ 703-710); FRANCES KELLOR, ARBITRATION IN THE NEW INDUSTRIAL SO- CIETY (1934). 210