Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
2. See, e.g., Mary Sarah Bilder, The Corporate Origins of Judicial Review, 116 YALE L.J. 502 (2006) (arguing that “the origins of judicial review
2. Nominally Private Executives 2272 conclusion 2277 CAMARA_09-11-06_FINAL 9/25/2006 7:29:03 PM the yale law journal 115:2254 2006 2256
Apr. 2, 2016), http://www.courant.com/opinion/op-ed/hc-op-alexander-keep-yale-tax-exempt-0403-20160401-story.html http://perma.cc/9JQ2-2LQQ. × Martha
on a rolling basis throughout the year, and you may submit your piece through the electronic system at any time. 2 All YLJ Forum pieces must be
The Committee accepts submissions for Collection topics and pieces in addition to soliciting them. 2 How to Submit YLJ Forum accepts pieces on a
any time. All YLJ Forum pieces must be submitted through the Journal’s online submission process. To 2 submit through our website, go to http
] alone is insufficient even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny”). 160. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k)(1)(A) (2000). 161
constitutionalism” in 1. Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2627 (2015) (Scalia, J., dissenting). 2. U.S. CONST. pmbl. 3. Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S
AND THE PEOPLE’S VOICE IN THE NEW GILDED AGE 204 (2018); Kent Greenfield, Reclaiming Corporate Law in a New Gilded Age, 2 HARV. L. & POL’Y REV. 1, 5
Innovation, supra note 62; see also Innovation Office Manual, Off. Legal Servs. Innovation 2-9 (Aug. 25, 2021), https://utahinnovationoffice.org/wp