Search results for: "The" (4774 results)
it left future courts to puzzle over how far Mayo v. Prometheus has reanimated these ghosts from the past and how to resolve their inconsistencies
bounds such as the quota contemplated here is that they force these discussions to happen ex ante and create a binding mechanism that will not be eroded by
Aug. 27, 1996) (“Citizens also participate directly in the conduct of public affairs when they choose or change their constitution or decide public
section 2-108 provide a way for states to create their own separate rules for consumers, but the relationship between the U.C.C. and these other
small units of a state are given initial labels, and these proto-districts then merge and grow until they fill out the state with the right number of
the small units of a state are given initial labels, and these proto-districts then merge and grow until they fill out the state with the right
those preferences that control. By theorizing these preferences in terms of a discursive relationship between the people and their delegates, and by
Section 3 of the Act, forcing them to get approval from a court before making subsequent changes to their election laws.5 1. 52 U.S.C. § 10304 (2018
the ILC has suggested that in some areas, states have been held liable for harms even when they took care to prevent them. Malcolm Shaw explains that
others. The theoretical premises of these accounts have tended not to matter much in what one might think of as their ideological work, as they