Search results for: "n" (4014 results)
between the “n.” and the note number, and if you need to cite both the note and the text on the page, use an “and” instead of an ampersand. • You can
917 n.116 (“The decision provoked unusual agreement among legal commentators—all negative.”). See Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, 748 F
change of position in light of an intervening decision); Brief for United States at 32 n.1, Peugh v. United States, 569 U.S. 530 (2013) (No. 12-62
344 n.7 (noting that § 1983 “should be read against the background of tort liability that makes a man responsible for the natural consequences of his
566, 568 n.1 (2021), which contends that “capitalizing ‘Black’ . . . with- out also capitalizing ‘White’ normalizes Whiteness, while the proper noun
ebay_and_craigs.html. 8. eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. Newmark, 16 A.3d 1, 11 (Del. Ch. 2010). 9. Id. 10. Id. at 11 n.15. 11. Id. at 11. 12. Id. at 10
Catholic churches ‘no longer . . . used for divine worship’ to be repurposed or sold for ‘profane [secular] but not sordid use.’” Id. at 825 n.19 (quoting
focusing on Henry); Treanor, supra note 2, at 717 n.140 (noting Anti-Federalist statements in New York and Virginia, as well as the Federalist response
599 (2003). 42. Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 412 n.35 (1989) (“Nothing in Bowsher, however, suggests that one Branch may never
and prompting polarizing countermeasures by corporate defendants.25 This Essay predicts that 24. See Parikh, supra note 19 (manuscript at 23 n.111