Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
Rev. 941 (2… See Stoddard, supra note 10; see also Doug NeJaime, Winning Through Losing, 96 Iowa L. Rev. 941 (2011) (arguing that regardless of its
29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2000)). 150. 29 U.S.C. § 2612(a)(1). 151. Id. §§ 2611(2)(B), 2614(b). 152. Charles L. Baum, Has Family Leave
Legislative Enactment Costs, 118 YALE L.J. 2, 4 (2008). 3. 128 S. Ct. 1346 (2008). 1724.MCGINNIS.1772.DOC 5/27/2009 6:16:19 PM the yale law
See, e.g., WEINBERG, supra note 25, at 2. 32. See Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002); Henig & Sugarman, supra note 11, at 23-24, 27-28
Harv. L. Rev. 4, 110 (2008); Teles, supra note 2. × See Geoffrey R. Stone, Understanding Supreme Court Confirmations, 2010 Sup. Ct. Rev. 381, 385
MODERN EXECUTIVE POWER 2-4 (1989). GOLDSMITH_9-12-06_BIG FINALE 9/25/2006 7:42:02 PM the president’s completion power 2305 President has authority
Summary of School Safety Statistics 1-2 (2017), https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/250610.pdf https://perma.cc/9CXX-DQ55. On the culture wars and the
Stat. 1892 (1990) (codified as amended at 25 U.S.C. § 1301(2) (2000), as recognized in United States v. Lara, 541 U.S. 193, 194, 197 (2004). See Montana
BEHAV. 507, 518 (2002). 17. See Gregory A. Eieseland, Embracing Today’s Conservative Juror, in 2 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE ANNUAL CONVENTION
ingly like the class actions that CAFA seemed to target. The question in Hood, 1. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) (2012). 2. 134 S. Ct. 736 (2014). 3. 28 U.S.C