Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
WENDELL HOLMES, JR., THE COMMON LAW 1 (Am. Bar Ass’n 2009) (1881). 1. People v. Evans, 379 N.Y.S.2d 912, 914 (Sup. Ct. 1975). 2. KEITH BURGESS
Id. at 53 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(m) (2012)). 76. See Nev. Dep’t of Human Res. v. Hibbs, 538 U.S. 721, 731 (2003). 77. Chadwick, 561 F.3d at 42
adult_marriages_minors_law [http://perma.cc/VUG9-LW8Z]. 2. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 562 (2003). the (not so) new law of the child 943 Congress’s
pro- hibition of sexual orientation discrimination. 64. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (2012). 65. See Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S
even though [procured by] fraud . . . , a prosecution for rape cannot be maintained.”). 2. See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 159 F.3d 296, 299 (7th
2. JED RUBENFELD, REVOLUTION BY JUDICIARY: THE STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2005). RUBENFELD INTRODUCTION 6/20/2006 12:47:42 PM the
the latter. See Korematsu, 323 U.S. at 231-32 (Roberts, J., dissenting). See Korematsu, 323 U.S. at 219 n.2 (first citing National War Agencies
the legal-duty rule. Lewinsohn, supra note 2, at 725-28. See 1 E. Allan Farnsworth, Farnsworth on Contracts § 3.7 (3d ed. 2004); id. § 3.10 nn.8-12 and
H.R. 2231, 116th Cong. § 2(1) (2019) (defining an automated decision system as “a computational process . . . that makes a decision or facilitates
Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 239 (1976). 49. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k)(1)(A)(i) (1994); Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971). Congress