Search results for: "n" (3996 results)
and that in all nine, the government won. Id. at 1101. 29. Id. at 1101 & n.56. 30. See, e.g., Campbell v. McCarthy, 952 F.3d 193, 205 (4th Cir. 2020
; cf. CURRIE, supra note 34, at 161-62 & n.228 (noting that the 1795 statute omitted two requirements in the 1792 statute and watered down a third
the economy). See, e.g., Troy A. McKenzie, Toward a Bankruptcy Model for Nonclass Aggregate Litigation, 87 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 960, 961 n.2 (2012) (“I accept
of false and misleading labeling alleged here.” Sethavanish v. ZonePerfect Nutrition Co., No. 12-2907-SC, 2014 WL 580696, at 5 & n.5 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13
state court stemmed from the fact that it was at least the fifth holder of the debt.” Id. at 384 n.10. But on the other hand, res judicata creates
See Weiser, Cooperative Federalism, supra note 14, at 671 & n.27; see also MARTHA DERTHICK, THE INFLUENCE OF FEDERAL GRANTS: PUBLIC ASSISTANCE IN
Controlling Shareholders, 152 U. PA. L. REV. 785, 818 n.122 (2003) (noting a potential narrow reading of Solomon). SUBRAMANIAN OCT 19 NO HEADER 11
Passage.” White, supra, at 296 n.3. Helm, supra note 8. At trial, retired Deputy Police Chief Jeffrey Noble testified on behalf of the prosecution
& Sitaraman, supra note 11, at 182 & n.131. 28. See, e.g., Franchise Tax Bd. v. Hyatt (Hyatt II), 136 S. Ct. 1277 (2016). 29. See, e.g., Gibbons v. Ogden
Note, supra note 17, at 81 & n.80 (noting that South Carolina adopted a certification procedure by court rule). 26. 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2012