Search results for: "2" (3529 results)
U.S. CONST. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. 80. E.g., Murray’s Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co., 59 U.S. 272, 284 (1855). 81. E.g., Indus. Union
1130bilski_joint_appendix.pdf. 210. U.S. Patent No. 5,136,502 (filed Oct. 2, 1991). 211. U.S. Patent No. 5,001,630 (filed Dec. 20, 1988). 212. U.S. Patent No. 5,752,236
Vertuno, Dewhurst Tweet Says Bill Attempt To Close Clinics, STATESMAN (June 19, 2013, 2:28 PM), http://www.statesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt
for the District of Columbia generally followed three avenues to reach their goal: (1) admit the District as a state; (2) amend the Constitution; or (3
in part, the losses of the climate vulnerable. 15. Id. at 2533 n.2 (citing Nicholas Dawidoff, The Civil Heretic, N.Y. TIMES, Mar. 29, 2009 (Magazine
Foundation. 2 The case involved the issue of tax- payer standing to raise an Establishment Clause claim. Taxpayers generally do not have standing to
District of Columbia generally followed three avenues to reach their goal: (1) admit the District as a state; (2) amend the Constitution; or (3) retrocede
I.823.BOHMER.826.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/16 9:42 PM 823 Martín böhmer Robert Burt: Repetition and Insistence “What’s in a
exempt users, (2) existing and historic users, and (3) new users.” Id. at 914. The rules were changed in 2002 to define new permitted users: “(1
of disability). Ave. 6E Invs. LLC v. City of Yuma, No. 2:09-cv-00297, 2013 WL 2455928, at 3 (D. Ariz. June 5, 2013) (granting the city’s motion for