Search results for: "2" (3529 results)
§ 971, 124 Stat. 1376, 1915 (2010) (codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. § 78n(a)(2) (2012)). Coates, supra note 1, at 918 n.116. Amid many harsh critiques
[sending Section 20507(d)(2) notices based on nonvoting] in a guidance document first is- sued in 2010 and in two recent amicus filings, including a brief
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM J A N U A R Y 3 1 , 2 0 1 7 Community Policing as a Counter to Bias in Policing: A Personal Perspective Dr
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM J A N U A R Y 3 1 , 2 0 1 7 Systemic Implicit Bias Justin D. Levinson & Robert J. Smith 1 2 3 4 systemic
between venue and the scope of injunctive relief, particularly … Note This Note assesses the constitutionality of Texas House Bill 2 (H.B. 2), which
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM D E C E M B E R 5 , 2 0 1 6 Business Licensing and Constitutional Liberty Amanda Shanor 1 2 business
2-02-1052); Pritchett-Evans v. State Farm Ins. Co., No. 4:01-CV-97, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2870 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 28, 2003); Stipulation and Order
legislators). 141. See, e.g., Moshe Cohen-Eliya & Yoav Hammer, Nontransparent Lobbying as a Democratic Failure, 2 WM. & MARY POL’Y REV. 265, 266 (2011
at 78. 310. GORZ, supra note 113, at 7 n.2. 311. Id. 312. Id. the yale law journal 132:2497 2023 2570 Evaluating a reform for its non
REV. 1, 2 (2012). 15. See HASEN, supra note 13, at 247-50; LESSIG, supra note 13, at 271-72; Michael S. Kang, The Brave New World of Party Campaign