Search results for: "n" (3987 results)
Peck, 751 F.2d 1336, 1355 n.15 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (“An agency need not address every conceivable issue or alternative no matter how remote or
2005) (“A judge’s selection of a particular interpretive methodology will not necessarily credit that methodological choice as a holding.”); Pierre N
883. 57. See Siegel, supra note 49, at 1754-58, 1755 n.168 (explaining how Casey permits some departure from ordinary informed-consent practices
Mass., 868 F.2d 473, 480 n.6 (1st Cir. 1989) (noting in dicta that “Hazelwood . . . is not applicable to college newspapers”). 9. The parties
in Indian country); CAROLE GOLDBERG, REBECCA TSOSIE, ROBERT N. CLINTON & ANGELA R. RILEY, AMERICAN INDIAN LAW: NATIVE NATIONS AND THE FEDERAL SYSTEM
cases. the yale law journal 125 : 1880 20 16 1924 Category D en ie d D ism iss ed (I nc lu di ng W ith dr aw n) U nk no w n, o r
and Civil Liberties, 85 HARV. L. REV. 1133, 1317 n.133 (1972) [hereinafter Developments in the Law] (same). 9. H.R. REP. NO. 92-116, at 4, reprinted
46, 48 (Del. 1993). 7. Chander, supra note 1, at 141. 8. United States v. Carolene Prods Co., 304 U.S. 144, 152-53 n.4 (1938). 9. Douglas K
174 S I M O N B R E W E R The Attorney General’s Settlement Authority and the Separation of Powers abstract. This Note presents a novel defense of