Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
eds., 2017). × See, e.g., Emerson, supra note 23, at 2-3; Jean M. Yarbrough, Theodore Roosevelt and the American Political Tradition 19-24, 44-46 (2012
Argument at 41-42, Shelby County v. Holder, No. 12-96 (U.S. argued Feb. 27, 2013) [hereinafter Shelby County Transcript]. 2. Id. at 22-23
284 THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM O C T O B E R 2 7 , 2 0 2 0 After Aurelius: What Future for the Insular Cases? Adriel I. Cepeda Derieux & Neil C
U.S. 723. 52. U.S. CONST. art. I, § 9, cl. 2. 53. Boumediene, 553 U.S. 723. 54. Id. passim. the yale law journal 120: 1999 2011 2024
the four essays comprising this Collection. 1. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., 597 U.S. 215 (2022). 2. N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v
this essay focuses on Chapter 7, “Spheres of Humiliation.” 2. Id. at 128. 3. See DEBORAH HELLMAN, WHEN IS DISCRIMINATION WRONG? (2008); AVISHAI
Cir. 2002); People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Rasmussen, 298 F.3d 1198, 1202 n.2 (10th Cir. 2002) (citing F.E.R. v. Valdez, 58 F.3d 1530
Pelisson, 2 Companies Control Most of the Sunglasses Bought in the US, Bus. Insider (Aug. 25, 2017, 3:40 PM), http://uk.businessinsider.com/companies
curiam). 61. Id. at 77-78 (quoting Uttecht v. Brown, 551 U.S. 1, 7 (2007)). 62. Id. at 79. deference spillover 357 substantial impairment, and (2) the
Raines v. Byrd, in which members of Congress brought a constitutional challenge to the Line Item Veto Act.9 The 2. Id. at 2367. 3. 140 S. Ct. 2183