Search results for: "n" (3987 results)
174 S I M O N B R E W E R The Attorney General’s Settlement Authority and the Separation of Powers abstract. This Note presents a novel defense of
circuits vary widely in approach, which is not surprising given the conflicting signals from the Supreme Court.”); Jeffries, supra note 61, at 250 n.151
only “federal agencies” and its narrow definition of “record,” see PAUL M. SCHWARTZ & JOEL R. REIDENBERG, DATA PRIVACY LAW 92 n.4 (1996); and U.S
them out of your neighborhood. Garza v. Cty. of Los Angeles, 918 F.2d 763, 778 n.1 (9th Cir. 1990) (Kozinski, J., concurring and dissenting in part
J., dissenting). 59. See Korematsu, 323 U.S. at 219 n.2 (first citing National War Agencies Appropriation Bill for 1945: Hearings Before the
Accordingly, it has not played a major role in the case. See Abbott Labs., 233 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 744 n.10 (noting that the court was not relying on M
marriage continues to encourage role-specialization of spouses, even though it now does so in a sex-neutral way). Schleicher, supra note 6, at 110 & n.139
87. Schleicher, supra note 6, at 110 & n.139 (“It should be noted that these costs do not neces- sarily match actual ‘incidence’ inside families, any
application of RFRA. Id. at *3 n.5 (citations omitted) (quoting Navajo Nation, 535 F.3d at 1070). 471. Bear Lodge Multiple Use Ass’n v. Babbitt, 175 F