Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
likely to negotiate a lower 175. See also City Capital Assocs. v. Interco Inc., 551 A.2d 787, 798 (Del. Ch. 1988) (“[A]n active negotiator with
BRIDGES, supra note 1, at 65. 137. E.g., Karl N. Llewellyn, Some Realism About Realism—Responding to Dean Pound, 44 HARV. L. REV. 1222 (1931). 138
[https://perma.cc/NLA3-GMPV]. 256. United States v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 552 F. Supp. 131, 141-42 & n.42 (D.D.C. 1982), aff ’d sub nom. Maryland v
; cf. CURRIE, supra note 34, at 161-62 & n.228 (noting that the 1795 statute omitted two requirements in the 1792 statute and watered down a third
other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself. THE FEDERALIST NO. 51, supra, at 323 (James Madison). See generally JACK N. RAKOVE
immunity” to “ensur[e] accountability”). This role is made necessary by limited governmental resources. See, e.g., Zietlow, supra, at 208 n.409
standing objection is no guarantee against losing on the merits.”); Nelson, supra note 45, at 737, 759. 176. See Lexmark, 572 U.S. at 128 n.4) (observing
and that in all nine, the government won. Id. at 1101. 29. Id. at 1101 & n.56. 30. See, e.g., Campbell v. McCarthy, 952 F.3d 193, 205 (4th Cir. 2020
prohibits discrimination against the disabled in public services, is also unenforceable against the states. Garrett, 531 U.S. at 360 n.1. Most circuits
note 38, at 974 n.17; see also infra Section II.B. 42. See supra notes 24-29 and accompanying text. 43. See, e.g., Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S