Search results for: "The" (4773 results)
national security—even if seemingly unfounded—or whether, in some situations, they can closely scrutinize those assertions. The themes of the first
processes are theirs, not ours. If these are the likely consequences—as many knowledgeable groups told the Court they were—could our democratic
supposed San Francisco inventories to journalists. I have reviewed these documents and the original files from which they were copied; there is nothing
of the pro-life defeats during the 1987-1992 period, lawmakers in these states understand that they have nothing to gain by defining themselves as
states and localities where people have not adequately adjusted their withholding to reflect the deductions they have lost. Given the differences in
recognize that their DOJ credentials might provide them with a unique ability to further the work being done—if only they were allowed to take
and communication with them necessarily difficult, and above all that they stood in deadly peril of their lives.”25 And yet, the subsequent history of
therefore subjected them to strict scrutiny. 78 But be- cause it viewed campaign contribution limits as a lesser infringement on these rights, the Court
experiences that federal appellate judges brought with them to the bench. It then compares the prior professional 8. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335
on these terms, there should be little wonder that they have begun to dri�. Instead, the real marvel may be that more words have not been