Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
been raised by the parties.”); Brubaker, supra note 3, at 996 n.130 (acknowl- edging that “non-debtor releases raise serious constitutional concerns
raised by the parties.”); Brubaker, supra note 3, at 996 n.130 (acknowl- edging that “non-debtor releases raise serious constitutional concerns,” but
inaction is a passage that states that “[n]ominations neither confirmed nor rejected during the session at which they are made shall not be acted upon
ADMIN. L. REV. 889 (2007). 41. The possibility is raised, briefly, in Strauss, supra note 39, at 348-49; and William N. Eskridge, Jr., No Frills
NORMA RAE (Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. 1979); see Sachs, supra note 330, at 375 n.134. the yale law journal 130:546 2021 620 employer or
only buildings spared was Saint Dominic Catholic Church. Garnett, supra note 9, at 119 n.97. Despite condemning and demolishing its priory, school, and
morals and general welfare.’” Comment, supra note 38, at 43 n.4 (quoting Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd., 136 N.E.2d 827, 836-37 (N.Y. 1956)); cf
Note, supra note 17, at 81 & n.80 (noting that South Carolina adopted a certification procedure by court rule). 26. 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2012
Amendment, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 547, 702 & n.442 (1999). See generally supra text accompanying notes 28-56 (describing the nullifica- tion framework
370 U.S. at 8. 69. Declaratory Judgment Act (DJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a) (2006). 70. Cf. Bob Jones I, 416 U.S. 725, 732-33 n.7 (1974) (“Nor need we