Search results for: "n" (3962 results)
majority of the court concurred.” Id. at 244 n.1; see also Batholomew H. Sparrow, The Insular Cases and the Emergence of American Empire 87 (2006) (“No
370 U.S. at 8. 69. Declaratory Judgment Act (DJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a) (2006). 70. Cf. Bob Jones I, 416 U.S. 725, 732-33 n.7 (1974) (“Nor need we
United States v. Viloski, 814 F.3d 104, 110 (2d Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 1223 (2017); McLean, supra note 19, at 834-35, 835 n.7 (citing
Constitutionalism Now, 75 FORDHAM L. REV. 575, 578-79 & n.14 (2006) (noting that critical legal theory evolved into structural and existential schools); see also
” justifications for treaty terminations). See Amirfar & Singh, supra note 2, at 446 n.16 (“The subject of a sole Executive Agreement must necessarily be within
85 & n.8; CORNELL, supra note 69, at 142-43. 88. See supra note 71 and accompanying text. 89. Statute of Northampton, 1328, 2 Edw. 3, c. 3 (Eng
Marquez, 462 U.S. 579, 584 n.3 (1983) (finding that a suspicionless documentation check of a boat was not affected by the agents’ motive of drug
; id. at 321 n.2 (noting and distinguishing an alternative setting, not present in Weyerhaeuser, in which a “monopsonist could . . . also recoup its
LABOR, AND POLITICS IN THE POST-CIVIL WAR NORTH, 1865-1901, at 55-56, 265 n.30 (2001); FITZGERALD, supra note 358, at 6, 165-69; ERIC FONER, NOTHING
[$967]. Because adultery is not a crime, and because H had persistently threatened physical harm to N and his family, there was no basis for either