Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
Marquez, 462 U.S. 579, 584 n.3 (1983) (finding that a suspicionless documentation check of a boat was not affected by the agents’ motive of drug
plain meaning.”88 The court asserted that “[i]n com- mon parlance, one would not ordinarily think of a newborn infant suffering from multiple birth
273, 287-88 n.17 (1987) (citing 45 C.F.R. § 84.3(k) (1985)). As noted above, Section 1557 incorporates Section 504’s discrimination prohibition by
to the public, we need not inquire 284. Id. at 43 n.247; see also id. at 59 (noting the merger “could make it more difficult for providers other
; id. at 321 n.2 (noting and distinguishing an alternative setting, not present in Weyerhaeuser, in which a “monopsonist could . . . also recoup its
may be an exception. Richard H. Fallon, Jr. & Daniel J. Meltzer, New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies, 104 HARV. L. REV. 1731, 1779 n
764 C O M M E N T Tailoring Regimes for a Designer Drug: Developing Civil Liability for Retailers of Synthetic Marijuana introduction Over
note 76, at 1165 n.73. 298. One arguable exception to this can be found in Nagareda, supra note 7, which is discussed below. See infra notes 369
“to 57. See supra notes 25-26 and accompanying text (describing the rule outlined in the Freeman con- currence). 58. Adam N. Steinman, Case Law
Freeman plurality.52 This Part defines the notion of a logical subset, and then turns to the particular 46. See Duvall, 740 F.3d at 611, 614, 617 n