Search results for: "17" (2417 results)
judgment where the defendant demonstrated that the plaintiff failed to show that “she was treated differently from similarly situated males”). 17
954 (Sotomayor, J., concurring). 17. 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967). 18. Jones, 132 S. Ct. at 957 (Sotomayor, J., concurring). 19. See Orin S. Kerr, The
anyone who has had health insurance and who otherwise meets HIPAA’s coverage eligibility requirements.”17 Under the statute, HMOs are permitted to
proceedings. 17. Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 178 (1997) (first quoting Chi. & S. Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 113 (1948
The Y2K Act,17 for example, is titled “ An Act To Establish Certain Procedures for Civil Actions Brought for Damages Relating to [Y2K Failures].” 18
purchase price (less whatever price at which the target may be sold to the next buyer). 17. The Court of Chancery has long noted the “self-referential
First Amendment protection.17 But the underlying comparison, I argue, is tenuous. The speech interests are fundamentally different. The doctrinal fate
price (less whatever price at which the target may be sold to the next buyer). 17. The Court of Chancery has long noted the “self-referential
the applicant, who had honorably completed two previous tours of duty, “was diagnosed with PTSD or any mental condition prior to his discharge on 17
from the ordinary business of ruling a special kind of lawmaking, which promulgated the fundamental law of a polity.17 Such fundamental law could be