Search results for: "2" (3517 results)
II, § 2, at 204 (Raymond Wilburn ed., 1947) (1689). See 1 Edward Coke, The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England § 21, at 24 b (photo
told about the compliance officer. 175. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (2018). the yale law journal 128:2122 2019 2162 issued guidance on the use of
Feb. 5, 2022), https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2821%2902252-2 https://perma.cc/9BYS-VB8H (“Had the second line of regulators
2. Other related terms include “mandate” (eighty) and “popular mandate” (fifteen). the yale law journal 123:2576 2014 2580 winning broad
property laws); 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2),… 28 U.S.C. § 157(d) (2018). The phrase “withdraw the reference” comes from Section 157(d), wh… A final
Ct. 355 (2017); and United States v. Tribune Publishing Co., No. 2:16-cv-01822 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2016). We note that the degree to which the
of Protection: Abortion Restrictions Under Casey/Carhart, 117 Yale L.J. 1694, 1751 (2008). 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3205(a)(2)(i) (2014) (“The department
2001). 2. This was recently described in RICHARD A. POSNER, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW 26-29 (5th ed. 1998). As Ayres and Craswell point out, authors
intervening to protect speech, see FISS, supra note 2, at 21-25, 28; and OWEN M. FISS, The Right Kind of Neutrality, in LIBERALISM DIVIDED, supra
United States v. Perea, No. 2:08-cr-20160 (D. Kan. Jan. 7, 2010), http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-ksd-2_08-cr-20160/pdf/USCOURTS -ksd-2_08-cr