Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
62. Id. § 2000bb-1(1)-(2). 63. See, e.g., The Religious Freedom Restoration Act: Hearing on S. 2969 Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 102d Cong
problems with her response. Contrary to her claim that my article ignores NIMBYism, Pratt, supra note 2, at 499, large sections of the article are
pri- mary and secondary schools). 296. Milliken, 418 U.S. at 756 n.2 (Stewart, J., concurring). the yale law journal 128:2302 2019 2352 where
NAT’L LAW. GUILD 2 (Oct. 2013), https://www.nlg.org/wp-content /uploads/2017/03/DinnerJournal2013-FULL-FINAL-reduced.pdf [https://perma.cc/5XHL
TUSHNET, WEAK COURTS]. T198. T S. AFR. CONST., 1996, ch. 2, §§ 26-27, 29. On the South African Constitutional Court’s approach to enforcing these
Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism . . . . 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2, 120-21 (1866). 2. Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944
2010 Census: Georgia, Prison Pol’y Initiative (Mar. 2… Fixing Prison-Based Gerrymandering After the 2010 Census: Georgia, Prison Pol’y Initiative (Mar
2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 548 (Ct. App. filed Mar. 25, 2008). 2. The term “home school” does not actually appear anywhere in California statutes or
S. Ct. 2893 (2009). 2. Pub. L. No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81 (2002). 3. 494 U.S. 652 (1990) (holding that corporations may be prohibited from
State Authority.2 But early on, I was convinced that his thesis had a far wider range of application. His insights were crucial in helping me to