Search results for: "2" (3511 results)
State v. Bryant, 2020-00077, p. 2 (La. 7/31/20), 300 So. 3d 392, 393 (Johnson, C.J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (arguing that the habitual
Edimo-Doualla, 464 F.3d 276 (rejecting IJ’s conclusion that petitioner had to show sig… See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2)(iii) (2006)(“Considering the
EUNAVFOR Signs Agreement, supra note 20. See Council Decision 2016/993, supra note 19; Council Decision 2015/778, supra note 9, art. 2. See S.C. Res
+ Φ(Xit ∙ Zj) + εijt(2) where Zj is a vector of agency attributes, to be explained below, and the remaining terms are as defined above. The variables
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE para. 2 (U.S. 1776). 67. THE FEDERALIST NO. 40 (James Madison). 68. Id. the yale law journal 123:2644 2014
27626c5ef5fb_story.html. 2. See Eric Holder, U.S. Att’y Gen., Remarks on Criminal Justice Reform at Georgetown University Law Center (Feb. 11, 2014), http
Cassella, Asset Forfeiture Law in the United States § 2-9, at 62 (2007) (dismissing such an approach as simply asking “how . . . the forfeiture make the
248-57. 105. See Council Decision 2016/993, supra note 19; Council Decision 2015/778, supra note 9, art. 2. 106. See S.C. Res. 2312, supra note 14
documents); Temporary Protected Status: An Overview, AM. IMMIGR. COUNCIL 2-3 (2022), https://www. americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files
Decision 2016/993, supra note 19; Council Decision 2015/778, supra note 9, art. 2. 106. See S.C. Res. 2312, supra note 14; Council Decision 2015/778, supra