Search results for: "2" (3511 results)
LEVINSON_PDF.DOC 2/2/2010 2:36:45 PM 99 Sanford levinson Assessing the Supreme Court’s Current Caseload: A Question of Law or
Destroy Kyiv Power Plant, Damage Other Stations, Reuters (Apr. 11, 2024, 2:45 PM PDT), https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-missile-strike-targets
uploads/2010/04/CBA-Report-3.10.13.pdf http://perma.cc/S6UN-ZXZW (reviewing similar critiques). Sunstein, supra note 2, at 264-65 (“In other, more
1922). 2. Id. at 96-97. 3. Id. at 98. 4. See WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE, JR. ET AL., CASES AND MATERIALS ON LEGISLATION app. 34 & n.158 (4th ed. 2007
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: CASES AND MATERIALS 17, 17 (3d ed. 2006). 2. See, e.g., In re Gen. Teamsters, 265 F.3d 869, 873 (9th Cir. 2001) (“The
Judicial Review of Federal Banking Agency Decisions, 2 Ann. Rev. Banking L. 235, 245-47 (1983) (surveying theories of judicial review in the banking-law
; Strauss, supra note 2, at 581, 604. Cf. William N. Eskridge Jr. & John Ferejohn, A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution 6-7 (2010
Nov. 21, 2017), https://adminguide.stanford.edu/chapter-1/subchapter-7/policy-1-7-2 #anchor-24451 [https://perma.cc/YN2B-CH9S]. 10. Colleen
e.g., COLO. REV. STAT. ANN. § 24-34-402 (1) (West 2012), with 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2012); see infra notes 153-155 and accompanying text. 23
quoting THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE para. 2 (U.S. 1776)). 19. Id. at 32. 20. Id. 21. Robert Knowles & Marc D. Falkoff, Toward a Limited