Search results for: "2" (3508 results)
Actions, 57 Ariz. L. Rev. 201, 206-07 (2… See David H. Webber, Shareholder Litigation Without Class Actions, 57 Ariz. L. Rev. 201, 206-07 (2015); see
& Hartford R.R., 276 F.2d 525, 549 (2d Cir. 1960) (Clark, J., dissental). 2. Id. at 553 (Friendly, J., concurral). 3. United States v. Stewart, 597 F.3d 514
Court to limit Germany’s participation in the European Stability Mechanism. See BVerfG, 2 BvR 1390, 1421, 1438, 1439, 1440/12, Sept. 12, 2012, https
Competition Pol… E.g., Kenneth Heyer, Welfare Standards and Merger Analysis: Why Not the Best?, 2 Competition Pol’y Int’l 29 (2006). Case law generally holds
Institutionalization 215 2. Prosecutorial Discretion in a Second-Best Regulatory Environment 219 conclusion 223 the president and immigration law redux 107
Blasio, Mark-Viverito Announce Right to Counsel Initiative (Feb. 12, 2017, 2:24PM), http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/city-hall/story/2017/02/de
Ordinance 126384; San Diego, Cal., Mun. Code art. 1, div. 6, § 141.0602(b)(2) (2023); Cal. Gov’t Code § 65913.6 (West 2020); Pasadena, Cal., Code of
always have available the First Amendment rights of speech that all other members of society possess. See NeJaime & Siegel, supra note 2, at 2584 (“If
the United States.” As to the militia, on May 2, 1792, Congress passed what has become known as the Calling Forth Act. Section 1 of the Act focused on
Apr. 27, 2015); United States v. Kaszynski, No. 2:14-cr-13-FtM-29DNF, 2014 WL 5454324, at 12-15 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2014); DeGeorgis v. State, No