Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
authority is astounding. See, e.g., Gardley-Starks v. Pfizer, Inc., 917 F. Supp. 2d 597, 604 n.4 (N.D. Miss. 2013) (noting that “sixty-six decisions
12. Id. (quoting Cannon v. Univ. of Chi., 441 U.S. 677, 692 n.13 (1979)). 13. See Rochelle Bobroff, Section 1983 and Preemption: Alternative Means
2521 D E N A S H A T A E D I T O R - I N - C H I E F , Y A L E L A W J O U R N A L , V O L U M E 1 3 3 Introduction to the Special
Conversely, a complete ban on speaking or spending money—like the provision the Court 109. Bopp, supra note 12, at 243 n.50, 296; Curtis K. Tao, Note, A
under section 5. See City of Lockhart v. United States, 460 U.S. 125, 134 n.10 (1983) (“[T]he Beer Court did not distinguish between ameliorative
Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514, 525 n.8 (2001) (drawing “no distinction” between the media and non-media respondents in a case about the disclosure of
No. ST-2019-CV-00602, 2024 WL 1794417, at *15 n.4 (D.V.I. Apr. 24, 2024). 19. Justin Burnworth, The Curious Case of Justice Neil Gorsuch, 44 PACE
supra note 18, at 1432; Conti-Brown et al., supra note 1, at 83 n.379 (“Given that statutory government tort law allows no compensation for injury
generations believed, not just what a few 75. “‘History in the service of life can never be scientific history.’” Posner, supra note 74, at 578 n.8
Tapahe, Comment, After the Religious Freedom Restoration Act: Still No Equal Protection for First American Worshipers, 24 N.M. L. REV. 331, 347 n.72