Search results for: "2" (3504 results)
Power: What Were They Thinking?, 2 DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 165, 182-83 (2003). Parts I and II, infra, suggest, inter alia, my objections to this account
Economic Order, 129 Yale L.J. 1020, 1047-48 (2020). Id.; see also Island of Palmas (Neth. v. U.S.), 2 R.I.A.A. 829, 838 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1928) (“The
Williams, Prison Officials Join Movement To Curb Solitary Confinement, N.Y. Times (Sept. 2, 2015), http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/03/us/prison
ThinkProgress (Dec. 2, 2014), http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/12/02/3597770/americans-united-life-abortion http://perma.cc/CH4U-Q7CD. For an early
Republicans, and 4.6 members of neither party. Table 2 reports these results. Those respective scenarios have 10%, 15%, and 26% fewer Democrats and 6
Injunction Act) at 2-4, NFIB, 132 S. Ct 2566 (No. 11-398); Trans… Reply Brief for Petitioners (Anti-Injunction Act) at 2-4, NFIB, 132 S. Ct 2566 (No. 11
the current Fourth Amendment framework. 2. Tabbaa v. Chertoff, 509 F.3d 89, 102 n.4 (2d Cir. 2007) (“[D]istinguishing between inci- dental and
& n.12 (2013), Randy E. Barnett, Interpretation and Construction, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 65, 66 & n.2 (2011), and Randy J. Kozel, Settled Versus