Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
the tolerance for racism manifested in that case continues. 1. 228 F. Supp. 2d 531 (D.N.J. 2002). 2. 323 U.S. 214 (1944). 3. Both the
U.S. Dep’t of Just. & Fed. Trade Comm’n, Horizontal Merger Guidelines 2 (2010) hereinafter 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, https://www.ftc.gov
Morgan Ricks, Ganesh Sitaraman, Shelley Welton & Lev Menand, Networks, Platforms, and Utilities Law and Policy 1-2 (2022). This Feature contributes
Congress) (Harry A. Blackmun Papers, box 203, folder 6). × Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199, 218 & n.2 (1977) (Stevens, J., concurring in the judgment
indicated that what the Court means by history and tradition will decide the future of 1. 142 S. Ct. 2228, 2247 (2022). 2. Id. at 2302 (Thomas
York, 883 F.3d 45 (2d Cir. 2018), cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 939 (2019). 373. Petition for Writ of Certiorari at 1-2, NYSRPA, 139 S. Ct. 939 (No. 18-280
Expounding the Constitution, 130 Yale L.J. 2, 11-12 (2020), which describes how distinctions between different forms of legislation have historically
[permissible] factors also motivated the practice.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(m) (2006). I suspect that constitutional concerns would preclude mixed-motive
No. D072577); Brief of the Cal. Att’y Gen. as Amicus Curiae at 5 n.2, Abbott Labs., 233 Cal. Rptr. 3d 730 (No. D072577), 2017 WL 6939447. Both
the Chinese Exclusion Acts, 1882-1910, 25 Law & Soc. Inquiry 1, 2 (2000) (studying the enforcement of the Chinese Exclusion Act, and arguing that