Search

Search results for: "2" (3500 results)

Forum: Detention and Deterrence: Insights from the Early Years of Immigration Detention at the Border

Immigrants, Wash. Post (Oct. 2, 2019, 3:21 PM EST), https://www.washingtonpost.com /politics/2019/10/02/trumps-most-insulting-violent-language-is-often

Forum: Small-Donor-Based Campaign-Finance Reform and Political Polarization

’ Politico (Oct. 17, 2019), https://www.politico… Gerald F. Seib, Delaney’s Complaint: Democrats’ Primary System Tilts Left, Wall St. J. (Oct. 28, 2

Forum: Wayfair Undermines Nicastro: The Constitutional Connection Between State Tax Authority and Personal Jurisdiction

taxes and sales taxes are “functionally equivalent,” 2 Jerome R. Hellerstein et al., State Taxation ¶ 16.012 (3d ed. 2018), the Court has fostered

Ideological Imbalance and the Peremptory Challenge | Yale Law Journal

Conservative Juror, in 2 American Association for Justice Annual Convention Reference Materials (2007). × See, e.g., Harry Plotkin, December 2009 Jury

Microsoft Word - 12.Falk.D3_AuthorApproved_v1.docx

WENDELL HOLMES, JR., THE COMMON LAW 1 (Am. Bar Ass’n 2009) (1881). 1. People v. Evans, 379 N.Y.S.2d 912, 914 (Sup. Ct. 1975). 2. KEITH BURGESS

Soucek_b3b3fkxd

Id. at 53 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(m) (2012)). 76. See Nev. Dep’t of Human Res. v. Hibbs, 538 U.S. 721, 731 (2003). 77. Chadwick, 561 F.3d at 42

Guggenheim

adult_marriages_minors_law [http://perma.cc/VUG9-LW8Z]. 2. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 562 (2003). the (not so) new law of the child 943 Congress’s

Soucek_ncrxrrgq

pro- hibition of sexual orientation discrimination. 64. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (2012). 65. See Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S

Microsoft Word - Rubenfeld Introduction

2. JED RUBENFELD, REVOLUTION BY JUDICIARY: THE STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2005). RUBENFELD INTRODUCTION 6/20/2006 12:47:42 PM the

Microsoft Word - 13.Rubenfeld_OP_v4.docx

even though [procured by] fraud . . . , a prosecution for rape cannot be maintained.”). 2. See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 159 F.3d 296, 299 (7th