Search results for: "2" (3506 results)
WENDELL HOLMES, JR., THE COMMON LAW 1 (Am. Bar Ass’n 2009) (1881). 1. People v. Evans, 379 N.Y.S.2d 912, 914 (Sup. Ct. 1975). 2. KEITH BURGESS
Id. at 53 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(m) (2012)). 76. See Nev. Dep’t of Human Res. v. Hibbs, 538 U.S. 721, 731 (2003). 77. Chadwick, 561 F.3d at 42
adult_marriages_minors_law [http://perma.cc/VUG9-LW8Z]. 2. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 562 (2003). the (not so) new law of the child 943 Congress’s
pro- hibition of sexual orientation discrimination. 64. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (2012). 65. See Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S
2. JED RUBENFELD, REVOLUTION BY JUDICIARY: THE STRUCTURE OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2005). RUBENFELD INTRODUCTION 6/20/2006 12:47:42 PM the
even though [procured by] fraud . . . , a prosecution for rape cannot be maintained.”). 2. See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 159 F.3d 296, 299 (7th
; see also McCann, supra note 2, at 78 (calling for a “synthesis” of legal and social movement scholarship). the yale law journal 132:2304 2023
H.R. 2231, 116th Cong. § 2(1) (2019) (defining an automated decision system as “a computational process . . . that makes a decision or facilitates
Labor Force Proections to 2022: The Labor Force Participation Rate Continues to Fall, Monthly Lab. Rev., Dec. 2013, at 2 tbl.1 (showing that women
and National Railroad Passenger… Lilly Ledbetter Fair Play Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-2, 123 Stat. 5. Id. at 2791-92 (“Despite these authoritative