Search results for: "2" (3511 results)
134 Harv. L. Rev. 265, 266-67 (2020); Anita S. Krishnakuma, Textualism’s Fault Lines 2-3 (Geo. Univ. L. Ctr., Working Paper No. 2506, 2023), https
of the Constitution 265-66 (Merrill Jensen ed., 1976) (presenting article 9, section 2 of the draft of the Committee of Detail); Shelfer, supra, at
Raines v. Byrd, in which members of Congress brought a constitutional challenge to the Line Item Veto Act.9 The 2. Id. at 2367. 3. 140 S. Ct. 2183
contents introduction 2582 i. marbury, counter-marbury, and the new deal 2584 A. Interpretation as Policymaking 2585 1. Law and Policy 2585 2
quoting Unexpected Support, Homophile Action League Newsletter (Phil., Pa.), Jan. 26, 1971, at 2-3). Mary Frances Berry, Why ERA Failed 82 (1986) (“The
Aroused,” 2 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 129, 146 (2003). Padilla, 233 F. Supp. 2d at 603 (“Access to counsel need be granted only for purposes of presenting
Roots Up, in The War on Poverty: A New Grassroots History, 1964-1980, at 1, 2-3, 15 (Annelise Orleck & Lisa Gayle Hazirjian eds., 2011). See Paul Frymer
237 THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM JA N U A R Y 3 , 2 0 2 5 The Politics and Perverse Effects of the Fight Against Online Medical
Sukol, supra note 53. 2 U.S.C. § 285b(1) (2012). Note that this statute’s reference to “understood . . . inten… 2 U.S.C. § 285b(1) (2012). Note that
+ Φ(Xit ∙ Zj) + εijt(2) where Zj is a vector of agency attributes, to be explained below, and the remaining terms are as defined above. The variables