Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
confrontation,” Ewing & Kysar, supra note 4, at 366, an assertion that I find puzzling. See U.S. R.R. Ret. Bd. v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166, 176 n.10 (1980) (“The
L. REV. 603, 603 n.2 (2006) (defining civil Gideon as “the categorical, federal constitutional right to appointed counsel at civil trial, comparable
Catholic churches ‘no longer . . . used for divine worship’ to be repurposed or sold for ‘profane [secular] but not sordid use.’” Id. at 825 n.19 (quoting
reach the issue. See United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149, 167 n.18 (1987) (“We need not decide if either the generalized governmental interest
155, 206 n.227 (1994) (“Community rating without a mandate could lead to an adverse selection problem. New York State, in 1992, enacted legislation
these decisions." Id. at 58 n.107. Thus, if not all shareholders cast ballots, the threshold for approval will be higher than 50% of shares that have
treatise. Oppenheim stated: [N]o State which is a member of the Family of Nations can at some time or another declare that it will in future no longer
By the 1970s, the Fed not only had teams of technologists 160. O’Connell, supra note 12, at 853 n.47 (characterizing the Fed as a boundary
See Weiser, Cooperative Federalism, supra note 14, at 671 & n.27; see also MARTHA DERTHICK, THE INFLUENCE OF FEDERAL GRANTS: PUBLIC ASSISTANCE IN
n.51, 36-38, Indiana v. Mayor- kas, No. 23-cv-00106 (D.N.D. May 31, 2023). 47. See E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, 349 F. Supp. 3d 838, 868 (N.D