Search results for: "n" (3793 results)
335, 353 n.58 (1989) (noting that, in some states, “the disfranchisement of paupers was integral to the process which broadened the suffrage”). 3
supra note 15, at 146 n.14. Note also that Frank Michelman has made closely related arguments. See Frank I. Michelman, The Supreme Court, 1985
supra note 14, at 31-32 n.98. 75. See Hannon, supra note 67, at 1830; Hatamyar, supra note 71, at 584-85, nn.200, 202; Hatamyar Moore, supra note 14
government approach to civil rights”). 108. LANDSBERG, supra note 11, at 157 n.10 (urging political appointees to ensure that civil-service lawyers enforce
Nw. U. L. Rev. 437, 449 n.60 (2009). By “State Farm with teeth,” I mean a more searching standard than the ordinary, highly deferential one that lets
Police Discretion and the Quality of Life in Public Places: Courts, Communities, and the New Policing, 97 Colum. L. Rev. 551, 586 & n.181 (1997
war against.”); supra note 8. 35. Letter from Lori F. Damrosch to John Hart Ely 2 (May 1, 1992) (on file with author). 36. ELY, supra note 2, at 163 n
of these marginal taxpayers’ gifts. See Brody, supra note 9, at 695 n.18. POZEN_12-18-06_PRE-CONTACT 1/19/2007 5:54:34 PM the yale law journal 116
State Law Products Liability Claims, 103 NW. U. L. REV. 437, 449 n.60 (2009). By “State Farm with teeth,” I mean a more searching standard than the
803 n.8 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (Bork, J., concurring)). 3. Martin H. Redish, Judicial Review and the ‘Political Question,’ 79 NW. U. L. REV. 1031, 1031