Search results for: "IF" (3804 results)
early American precedent. If the Founders intended that the Constitution would be interpreted according to the rules of public legislation, then the
its substance. That is, it argues that even if section 5 has been damaging in the way Thernstrom suggests, that damage is not cause to invalidate the
credit, we argue that its impact has, if anything, been understated. Private credit should instead be understood as heralding a sharp reversal in the
I conclude, we’re better off embracing the future responsibly than resisting it. Even if we can’t give everyone lawyers, we can at least give more
U.S. 347, 356 (1909) (“For another jurisdiction, if it should happen to lay hold of the actor, to treat him according to its own notions rather
misguided because it says that the speech of government employees within their jobs is not protected even if the speech involves a matter of public concern
functioning patent system.15 It proceeds on the premise that no matter how elegantly policymakers craft patent law, if generalist judges lack the capacity to
where purposivism now lives on, clothed in new (textualist) garb. To adapt Justice Kagan’s quip, if we are all textualists now, we might also all be
for lower courts to import dual sovereignty into Sixth Amendment jurisprudence.16 If there is truly “no difference” between the meanings of offense
merger between two large companies is viewed as generally harmless from an antitrust perspective if it results in lower prices. But many have critiqued