Search results for: "A" (4257 results)
as importantly and acutely wrong. Anderson argues that Congress or some other decisionmaker can and should employ a set of policy solutions to revive
recommendations, “assuming a state continues to act in accordance with its attestations.” Thus, although the exchange was technically federally managed
formation as a baseline and fails to appreciate the importance of ART to same-sex family formation. See id. at 1476. Legal scholars debate the extent to
critical in correcting FEMA’s mistakes.40 A fee provision would also improve the accuracy of agency decisions. An additional cost that attached only as a
doubt is easy to create or appropriate as a defense theory in all or most cases. See Scott E. Sundby, The Capital Jury and Absolution: The Intersection
shrift?29What explains this “constitutional amnesia”?30And at a timewhen, as Pozen puts it, “Americans are accustomed to seeing [the Constitution] at the
scheme.3 I found her argument compelling on all counts and was humbled by her uncanny ability to set it out so lucidly in such a small space; it had a
activists at Gustavus Adolphus College are protesting and petitioning the school to release aggregate sanctioning data after a survivor alleged publicly
even as they anticipated the ascendancy of the individual in state elections. This historical evidence informs a structural and textual account of
interpreters to see “what role to assign the ambiguous provision.” At its strongest, a structural argument of this type points out an incompatibility between