Search results for: "9" (3050 results)
2d 9, 12 (Or. 1966)); Cecola v. Ruley, 12 S.W.3d 848, 855 (Tex. App. 2000) (“If the property can be divided in kind without materially impairing its
prerequisite for federal expenditures. See U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 7 (“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations
Offenders: A 5-Year Follow-up Study in the United States, 9 Int’l J. Crim. Just. Sci. 16 (2014)). Reginald Dwayne Betts, Could an Ex-Convict Become an
Enforceability TBD: From Status to Contract in Intellectual Property Law, 96 B.U. L. Rev. 869, 869 (2016); see also Arnow-Richman et al., supra note 22, at 9
§ 597 (1934) [hereinafter RESTATEMENT (FIRST)]. 9. See, e.g., RESTATEMENT (SECOND), supra note 8, § 137; RESTATEMENT (FIRST) supra note 8, § 596
Atrocious Prisons Conditions Make Us All Less Safe, Brennan Ctr. for Just. (Aug. 9, 2021), https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/how
determined ordinarily by whether … Feature The United States’ aggressive War on Terror policies since 9/11 have led to significant prison sentences for
Congress is to decide whether we go to war, and whom we go to war against.”). 9. War Powers Resolution, Pub. L. No. 93-148, 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. (87 Stat
legislative directive, see, e.g., Iowa Admin. Code r. 641-99.15(144) (2016); La. Stat. Ann. § 9:2718 (2016); Neb. Stat. Ann. § 25-21,200 (West 2016), or
the Constitution 5 (2001); Mitchell N. Berman, Constitutional Decision Rules, 90 Va. L. Rev. 1, 9, 167 (2004); Henry P. Monaghan, The Supreme Court