Search results for: "710" (348 results)
1992)). 343. Hollingsworth, 570 U.S. at 710; see also id. at 715 (“States cannot alter [the federal courts’ lim- ited] role simply by issuing to
296. R_20MuTZMfGsRChOL. 297. 710 F.3d 875, 880 (9th Cir. 2013). 298. Id. at 911. 299. See id. at 902 (concluding that the district court did not
committed with a firearm). 238. Perez-Gallan, 640 F. Supp. 3d at 697. 239. Id. at 703. 240. Id. at 710 (quoting Kanter v. Barr, 919 F.3d 437, 458 (7th
the yale law journal 134:696 2025 710 cases,68 and (infamously) the right to counsel for indigent criminal defendants.69 Though it is plausible to
F. Scott Kieff, Property Rights and Property Rules for Commercializing Inventions, 85 MINN. L. REV. 697 (2001). 168. Id. at 710. 169. See Duffy
; Jack M. Beermann, Common Law Elements of the Section 1983 Action, 72 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 695, 710-14 (1997). 5. For a sample of recent literature on
§§ 6-52-301 to 6-52-302 (2010); UTAH CODE ANN. § 10-2-710 (LexisNexis 2010); W. VA. CODE § 8-35-1 (2010). 34. In the face of a state legislative
are committed with a firearm). 238. Perez-Gallan, 640 F. Supp. 3d at 697. 239. Id. at 703. 240. Id. at 710 (quoting Kanter v. Barr, 919 F.3d 437, 458
32; Mark A. Lemley, The Myth of the Sole Inventor, 110 MICH. L. REV. 709, 710-11 (2012). Note that there is a circularity problem here: if the
to the peace of the African continent”). 163. See Alford, supra note 6, at 710 (noting that “[i]t would be over thirty years before the GATT Council