Search results for: "2" (3479 results)
See David H. Webber, Shareholder Litigation Without Class Actions, 57 Ariz. L. Rev. 201, 206-07 (2… Sarah N. Lynch, U.S. SEC’s Piwowar Urges Companies
marks omitted) (quoting… See id. at 241 (Murphy, J., dissenting) (noting that “nearly four months elapsed after Pearl Har… See id. at 219 n.2 (majority
L.J. 989 (1978). Cf. Tracey E. George & Albert H. Yoon, The Labor Market for New Law Professors, 11 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 1, 2 & n.4 (2014) (stating
Constitutional Court to limit Germany’s participation in the European Stability Mechanism. See BVerfG, 2 BvR 1390, 1421, 1438, 1439, 1440/12, Sept. 12, 2012
Supporters of the decision respond that 1. 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2006). 2. 582 F.3d 490 (3d Cir. 2009), cert. granted, 2010 WL 1623772 (U.S. Sept. 28
www.wired .com/entertainment/theweb/magazine/17-09/ff_craigslist. 6. factsheet, supra note 2. the yale law journal 121:2405 2012 2406 In
Forward 25, 2 MICH. J. ENVTL. & ADMIN. L. 267, 268-72 (2013) (discussing bipartisanship over environ- mental protection in the 1970s and 1980s); Michael
subtle that there appears to be striking disagreement within the field. Compare John W. Cooley with Steven Lubet, Arbitration Advocacy 2-3 (2d ed. 2003
of cases that the courts have heard concerning ot… See Lawrence Lessig, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace 98 (1999). Tien, supra note 22, at 2, 5
OCTOBER 20, 1913, at 2, 7 (1913). 251. See 9 BICKEL & SCHMIDT, supra note 100, at 791-94; Jeffrey J. Crow, An Apartheid for the South: Clarence