Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
Offerings 2 n.1, 4 nn.5-6 (Nov. 12, 2013) (unpublished manuscript), http://ssrn.com/abstract=2178052 [http://perma.cc/9MU2 the uneasy case for
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM N O V E M B E R 2 1 , 2 0 1 6 The “Freedom From Information” Act: A Look Back at Nader, FOIA, and What Went
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM N O V E M B E R 2 1 , 2 0 1 6 Beth Simone Noveck 1 2 3 4 5 the yale law journal forum November 21, 2016 6 7 8
note 18, at 1082 & n.29; see also LEWIS, supra note 2, at 146. But it is unlikely that they considered all of what might follow. See supra notes 7-11
ET AL., SUPREME COURT PRACTICE 548 (9th ed. 2007). 14. See id. at 549 n.4. 15. See id. at 550 n.6. 16. See Woodward v. Alabama, 134 S. Ct. 405 (2013
by manipulating the pool of claim- ants who vote. See, e.g., Jacoby, supra note 83, at 1745 n.55, 1756-58. 91. NAT’L BANKR. REV. COMM’N, supra note
governance i i . the n ew paradigm 23 24 25 26 the yale law journal forum April 26, 2017 27 28 29 30 hedge fund activism, short-termism, and a new
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM J A N U A R Y 3 1 , 2 0 1 7 The Implicit Racial Bias in Sentencing: The Next Frontier Mark W. Bennett
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM N O V E M B E R 2 1 , 2 0 1 6 Memorandums to Messages: The Evolution of FOIA in the Age of the Internet