Search results for: "2" (3480 results)
Injunction Act) at 2-4, NFIB, 132 S. Ct 2566 (No. 11-398); Transcript of Oral Argument at 46-54, NFIB, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012) (No. 11-398). Reply Brief for
in 2 Advances in Psychology and Law 35 (Brian H. Bornstein & Monica K. Miller eds., 2016). Catechism of the Catholic Church § 2267, http
note 2, at 264-65 (“In other, more unusual cases, agencies might know the potent… See generally, e.g., Robert S. Pindyck, Climate Change Policy: What
Bibas, Apprendi at 20: Reviving the Jury’s Role in Sentencing, 99 N.C. L. Rev. 1189, 119… Table E-2—Federal Probation System Statistical Tables for the
1031 (2002). The New Map of Life: 100 Years to Thrive, Stan. Ctr. on Longevity 2 (Nov. 2021), https:‌//‌longevity‌.stanford‌.edu‌/wp‌-content‌/uploads‌
; Alexa Van Brunt & Locke E. Bow… Fiona Doherty, Obey All Laws and Be Good: Probation and the Meaning of Recidivism, 104 Geo. L.J. 2… While, of course
2. Id. at 846 (Reinhardt, J., dissenting). the yale law journal 117:723 2008 724 announce decision in Hudson v. Michigan,3 the Ankeny
denial claims under section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Yet this status quo is doctrinally incoherent and constitutionally vulnerable. Courts, this
v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378, 384 (1987); Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142-43 (1983). 2. 547 U.S. 410, 421 (2006) (“We hold that when public
Contributions and Lobbying Corrupt? Evidence from Public Finance, 2 J.L. ECON. & POL’Y 145, 161 (2006) (arguing that “charging for access is in itself a form of