Search results for: "9" (3041 results)
Southern Poverty Law Center office—again, 7. See Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971). 8. 420 U.S. 636 (1975). 9. Frontiero v. Richardson, 411
light on the concerns it has provoked. 9. 42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107 (2006). 10. Peter H. Schuck, The Golden Age of Aging, and Its Discontents
& Tech. L. 1, 8-9 (2013) (describing the rise of cable television); Kevin Werbach, No Dialtone: The End of the Public Switched Telephone Network, 66 Fed
texts.9 By contrast, while claiming to apply the Fourth Circuit’s rule, the District Court for the District of Columbia has embraced a less nuanced
In particular, it focuses on which damage remedies and contract modifications create optimal ex ante incentives when uncertainty is present. 9 I
incentives when uncertainty is present.9 I refer to these penalties as “reflective” remedies because they focus on penalizing defendants by an amount
incentives when uncertainty is present. 9 I refer to these penalties as “reflective” remedies because they focus on penalizing defendants by an amount
insurance plan so unattractive as to result in significant adverse selection.9 Of course, the practical impact of this exception depends on how
Congress’s decision not to abolish diversity jurisdiction, see Singh v. Daimler-Benz AG, 9 F.3d 303, 306-10 (3d Cir. 1993). See Judicial Business of the
these cases are concerned with the correlative rights of neighbors.9 And some but not all are concerned with animus, or decisions made just to