Forum: Remedies and Incentives in Presidential Removal Cases

as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner at 9, Calcutt v. FDIC, 143 S. Ct. 1317 (2023) (No. 22-714), 2023 WL 2381068 hereinafter Scalia Law School

Forum: The Duty to Respond to Rulemaking Comments

adopted June 16, 2011), reprinted in Adoption of Recommendations, 76 Fed. Reg. 48789, 48791 (Aug. 9, 2011) (making no recommendation regarding agency

“Federal financial assis- tance”). 9. 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (2018) (prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program

17.Levitt_AuthorApproved

U.S. argued Feb. 27, 2013) (statement of Scalia, J.). 9. See, e.g., Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509, 564 (2004) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (“I would

ClymerFINAL

rules without violating the Constitution.9 5. See infra Subsection I.A.3. 6. See, e.g., United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 906 (1984) (describing

their own governance.9 And it ensures that public institutions serve as sites for the contestations, nego- tiations, and provisional outcomes that

Forum: Nurturing Parenthood Through the UPA (2017)

to Unif. Law Comm’rs (June 9, 2017), http://‌http://www.uniformlaws.org/shared/docs/parentage/2017AM Parentage IssuesMemo.pdf http://perma.cc/67UT

Forum: The Present Crisis in American Bail

San Francisco, No. 15-CV-4959-YGR, 2018 WL 424362, at 9 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2018); accord In re Humphrey, 228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 513, 528 (Ct. App. 2018); cf

Measuring the Fortress: Explaining Trends in Supreme Court and Circuit Court Dictionary Use

compiled the dictionary usage rates of all the liberal Justices and all the conservative Justices to produce the following graph: Figure 9. dictionary

Separate Spheres

to the poll tax. See, e.g., Rep. Moorhead, 111 Cong. Rec. H16,274 (daily ed. July 9, 1965) (arguing that “just as literacy tests discriminate against