Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
Prods. Co. v. Fed. Sec. Adm’r, 187 F.2d 789, 790 (3d Cir. 1951). See Sohoni, Power to Vacate, supra note 4, at 1123 n.5 (noting that the Trump
n.10; see also id. at 252 (“The distinction Coates draws be… Posner & Weyl, supra note 10, at 252 n.10; see also id. at 252 (“The distinction Coates
3HK4-SSFW (“n Tandon v. Newsom, a majority of the court formally adopted the most-favored-nation theory for the first time in a short per curiam
85. N. Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982); see supra notes 100-103 and… N. Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line
equity”). Cf. Collins, supra note 73, at 337 n.398 (“The early-nineteenth-century federal equity cases are… Cf. Collins, supra note 73, at 337 n.398 (“The
North Carolina’s admissions programs. SFFA, 600 U.S. at 198 n.2 (citing Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244, 276 n.23 (2003)). Justices Gorsuch and
× See Louis Michael Seidman, Critical Constitutionalism Now, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 575, 578-79 & n.14 (2006) (noting that critical legal theory evolved
See, e.g., Verstein, supra note 1, at 1128 n.88. I would suggest that putting quasi-translations in footnotes does not make it likely that readers will
2, is reproduced in a footnote in the opinion of the Court, but the Court says nothing about its terms. Id. at 426 n.1. Laurence H. Tribe, Comment, in
See Cornell, supra note 58, at 1720 & n.134. Moreover, the substance of this research was not referenced in briefs submitted to the Ninth Circuit before