Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
105. See Bowman et al., supra note 55, at 17 & n.80. 106. See Federal Employees Family Friendly Leave Act, Pub. L. No. 103-388, 108 Stat. 4079
Larrimore Ouellette & Rachel E. Sachs, The Medicare Innovation Subsidy, 95 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 75, 77 n.8 (2020) (“In practice, patents rarely map neatly onto
is by no means a certainty that land-use regulations reduce market land values.”). 76. OR. REV. STAT. § 197.352(7) (2005) (“[N]or shall the failure
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM N O V E M B E R 1 0 , 2 0 2 3 abstract. introduction 1 2 3 1 2 3 the yale law journal
more than one of the governance provisions in their remarks; no senator referred to all four mandates. ROMANO, supra note 19, at 134 n.261. For
to achieve the common goals of most people in the world”). 47. See, e.g., KAPLOW & SHAVELL, supra note 46, at 32 n.34 (noting the need for a common
%20DHS%20brief%20on%20PSG.pdf. 3 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular social group must be “visible”) and Matter of S-E- G
authority is outlined in Tedford v. Warner-Lambert Co., 327 F.3d 423, 426 n.4 (5th Cir. 2003). 34. FED. JUDICIAL CTR., supra note 12, at 92. 35. Id
interpretation of U.S. copyright law. Most notably, Judge N. Randy Smith, writing in dissent, argued forcefully that Garcia’s performance was not
Redacted%20DHS%20brief%20on%20PSG.pdf. 2 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular social group must be “visible”) and Matter of S-E- G