Search results for: "A" (4255 results)
Circuit, just to name a few. As of August 16, 2006, the blog has also been cited in at least seventy-eight law review articles. And the experts are writing
interest. International law is never more than an option, he argues, and not a very appealing one at that. Paulsen believes that the Constitution should
also undermine the imputed income argument, which relies on the belief that virtual items are for personal enjoyment and not intended for use in a
Notes & Comments Committee and may advise on student scholarship before or after its submission as a Note or Comment. PSEs are able to assist students
three possible reasons for not asking a nominee about his or her views about prior decisions. Upon examination, none make sense. One possible argument is
arguing that such an approach reduces the “opportunities . . . for mistakes.” Such a view, however, assumes that Supreme Court mistakes are only
order to get a court to order an agency to investigate whether a government action will cause a significant environmental harm in a National Environmental
clearly as it could have, a careful review of the case law reveals a concern about abuse and “a too permeating police surveillance.” This reading demands
unconstitutional. But what makes a regulation a ban and why should it matter? This Article addresses those questions, which are particularly pressing as the
should be given a chance to apply the law. The biggest roadblock to an antitrust-focused approach is not intrinsic but ideological—an antienforcement