Search results for: "2" (3470 results)
Minors to Receive Information, 2 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 223, 224 (1999) (describing the “emerging claim” that “minors have a right to receive information in
Model: A Balanced Review o… See Briffault, supra note 2, at 530-32. For example, survey research found that neighborhood counc… On the effects of
“presents many of the same issues and infirmities” as the New Hampshire law. Id. at 8 n.2. See id. at 2235 (Breyer, J., concurring in the judgment
ri… Article 118 Yale L.J. 2 (2008). This Article argues that courts can, and often should, implement constitutional guarantees by crafting doctrines
ALEXANDER M. BICKEL, THE LEAST DANGEROUS BRANCH: THE SUPREME COURT AT THE BAR OF POLITICS 71 (2d ed. 1986). 2. See id. 3. See, e.g., Margaret
Became Its Most Influential Justice 16 (2005). 2. I borrow this formulation from the indelible first sentence of Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood
undecided.2 The extent to which the concern is justified, however, depends in part on what is meant by “important,” and in part on whether it is
363, 369 n.2 (4th Cir. 2004). (applying the First National approach). Rowland, 506 U.S. at 200; see also United States v. Havelock, 664 F.3d 1284, 1289
1181 (D. Utah 2013) (No. 2:13-cv-217). × See, e.g., Janna Darnelle, Breaking the Silence, Pub. Discourse (Sept. 22, 2014) http
Distinctiveness of Religion in American Law: Rethinking Religion Clause Jurisprudence 228-78 (2015). Peter Jones, Bearing the Consequences of Belief, 2 J. Pol. Phil. 24 (1994).