Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
C.104.COX-RODRIGUEZ.225.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/17/16 11:15 PM 104 A d a m b . c o x & C r i s t i n a M . R o d r í g u e z
238 THE YALE LAW JO URN AL FORUM J A N U A R Y 1 5 , 2 0 1 6 The Liman Report and Alternatives to Prolonged Solitary Confinement
1, 3 n.8 (2002) (“[R]epeated play of the same game often converges to equilibrium no matter what subjects are thinking.”); Dhananjay K. Gode & Shyam
http://www.ibm.com/university (last visited Sept. 5, 2009). 126. See Mann, supra note 124, at 20, 31 n.129. For extensive discussion, see Barnett
not widespread, so “[a]n individual’s First Amendment right is infringed whether his speech is decreased by 5% or 95%, and whether he suffers alone or
637 THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM J A N U A R Y 1 1 , 2 0 1 8 Policing Work Boundaries on the Cloud Opeyemi Akanbi abstract. The
Practice Law: Examining the Character and Fitness Review Process, 72 NWLAWYER 12, 52, 54 n.6 (2018). 31. In re Wright, 690 P.2d 1134 (Wash. 1984). 32. In
interpretation of the courts. 14. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). 15. N. Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon Pipe
2009), available at http://cgrs.uchastings.edu/pdfs/Redacted%20DHS%20brief%20on%20PSG.pdf. 2 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006
3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular social group must be “visible”) and Matter of S-E- G-, 24 I. & N. Dec. 579 (BIA 2008) (particular social