Search results for: "n" (3654 results)
executive agreement. See Joint Resolution of June 19, 1934, ch. 676, 48 Stat. 1182; Hathaway, supra note 11, at 1300 & n.184. 122. An Act to Promote
13. See Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492 (2d Cir. 1996). 14. See, e.g., Williams v. Jones, 571 F.3d 1086, 1090 n.3 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing cases in
formerly governed by federal common law.’” Id. (quoting Milwaukee II, 451 U.S. at 314, 315 n.8). a tale of two climate cases 111 statutory scheme was
which they are to be pursued.”). 13. Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., No. 05cv1958-RMB (BLM), 2008 WL 66932, at *13, n.10 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2008
F.2d 994, 995 n.7, 996 nn.8-9, 998 & nn.17-18 & 21 (5th Cir. 1984) (Rubin, J., dissenting). 12. Goldstein, supra note 2, at 424 (internal quotation
with strong minimalist features.”). 21. District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783, 2822 (2008). 22. Id. at 2816-17. 23. Id. at 2817 n.26
at 2774 n.23 (majority opinion). Justice Stevens also noted that “[t]he Government does not argue otherwise.” Id. 168. See, e.g., Rebecca Brown
The Slippery Slope to Enron?, TAX NOTES TODAY, Mar. 26, 2002, 2002 TNT 58-26 (LEXIS). 67. TREASURY WHITE PAPER, supra note 2, at 14 n.53. 68. See
Turchik & Wilson, supra note 131, at 272. 135. See GREGORY L. VISTICA, FALL FROM GLORY: THE MEN WHO SANK THE U.S. NAVY 324-31, 425 n.54 (1995
& Wilson, supra note 131, at 272. 135. See GREGORY L. VISTICA, FALL FROM GLORY: THE MEN WHO SANK THE U.S. NAVY 324-31, 425 n.54 (1995