Search results for: "2" (3470 results)
1 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING NOTES AND COMMENTS This guide is meant to address questions commonly asked by student authors as they prepare to submit (or ...
39 GERARD E. LYNCH Frye and Lafler: No Big Deal The only surprise about the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Missouri v. Frye1 and Lafler v. Cooper2 is that there ...
K.831.IACOBUCCI.834.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/16 9:43 PM 831 Frank iacobucci A Tribute to My Friend, Professor Robert A. Burt “Please call me Bo.” With ...
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL POCKET PART 118:22 2008 22 christen linke young Agency Preemption Inputs in Riegel v. Medtronic Federal administrative agencies have ...
I can … 2 Gunnar Myrdal, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy 1382 n.13 (1944) (quo… Amanda Mae Petersen, Beyond Black and
error it may have made,” and (2) “guiding appellate review” of the sentence imposed. This Comment endorses these rationales and also draws attention
2-percent fee and the cardholder received no cash back (a net 2-percent fee). Treating the merchant fee in isolation seems to miss that basic point
The Yale Law Journal - Forum: Justice Sotomayor and the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Process Justice Sotomayor and the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Process The Supreme Court’s ...