cases, this Note surfaces several implicit—if still somewhat fuzzy—limiting principles regarding the types of reliance claims made by regulatory

formulaically, they combine an if-then proposition (If A, then B) with its inverse (If Not-A, then Not-B). Appellate courts on both sides of the circuit

Steinman_jukfz4hd

formulaically, they combine an if-then proposition (If A, then B) with its inverse (If Not-A, then Not-B). Appellate courts on both sides of the circuit

F6. Steinman Final Draft %5bTo Post%5d

formulaically, they combine an if-then proposition (If A, then B) with its inverse (If Not-A, then Not-B). Appellate courts on both sides of the circuit

formulaically, they combine an if-then proposition (If A, then B) with its inverse (If Not-A, then Not-B). Appellate courts on both sides of the circuit

Jacobs Article

permitted to veto the Board’s action if he disapproved. S. 826, 95th Cong. § 404(c) (1977). Statements in the record suggest that at least part of

was also permitted to veto the Board’s action if he disapproved. S. 826, 95th Cong. § 404(c) (1977). Statements in the record suggest that at least

suggested that “[p]erhaps scholars should reconsider, if only selectively, our focus on patents as an irreplacea- ble driver of pharmaceutical innovation

Campbell

Charles Dilly 1775) (“For if you punish the slanderer, you deter the fair inquirer.”). 25. Readers need not accept a general distinction between meanings

Vol.128 Style Sheet [Clean]

treat the citation as if it was in the main text, which means: ● Use semicolons to separate the citations from one another, even where there are