Search results for: "2" (3470 results)
adjudicative non-retroactivity as (1) a problem of legal philosophy; (2) a discretionary exercise for balancing competing right and reliance interests; (3
You wrong me and owe me compensation because of the wrong you have done me. (2) You pay me compensation and thereby make right (or make permissible
See infra Section II.B.2. The term “citizen” in this Article is used broadly to mean a member of a political community, and it is not meant to
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-444.pdf (to be reported at 132 S. Ct. 1399). 2. No. 10-209 (U.S. Mar. 21, 2012), http://www.supremecourt.gov
Finally, he speculated, “I think it’s about the legal regulation of science.” At 2:10 p.m., I walked into the seminar, and met Burke Marshall for
preventing people with HIV from enlisting or being commissioned as officers, (2) rules prohibiting service members with HIV from deploying to combat zones
me and owe me compensation because of the wrong you have done me. (2) You pay me compensation and thereby make right (or make permissible) what would
He draws three lessons from this: (1) that American interests are entwined with the interests and activities of foreign countries; (2) that the
sociology, I do mean to evoke Max Weber… Brief for Respondent at 1-2, Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (No. 10-277). Brief for Petitioner at 23-34, Dukes, 131 S
145, 155 (1968) (“A right to jury trial is granted . . . to prevent oppression.”). See Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 477 (2000) (quoting 2